It's always at the times you need people around the most that you shut most of them out
Or is that just me?
Probably just me.
Is it their worth, or is it your own worth that you are measuring in order to shut people out?
(have you ever noticed that when a situation becomes uncomfortable for any person, you stop using "I" and start using "you", as if it were a hypothetical situation? Human instinct I guess)
Anyways.
The general respect I have been getting from people as of late is lacking.
Do you really think that just because you don't say it in my presence, means that I don't hear it?
Unfortunately, I hear everything.
Lexie, Lexie, Lexie.
She acted just like that.
Held no moral weight for her words, her actions, and how they affected other people.
All that really mattered was her enjoyment in the moment,
and never how that enjoyment affected her friends, her family, her outward image;
I've never understood how a person could just not care about any of that.
Trust, trust, trust.
How are you supposed to trust anyone, when everyone is genuinely interested in their own well being and nothing else?
You can't blame them,
but you don't like it either.
So what is one supposed to do when there are words both said and unsaid,
that points favoritism in a direction
(that is neither fair, nor unfair)
but still gives off general ideas of whom should be used for what.
Both images of a person, used for sexual purposes
(what else are people for of course?)
But one more than the other.
One image, genuinely used for conversation, for the release of emotions, for feelings and of course the occasional release of invading sexual frustrations,
can arguably become no longer an image, but a tangible, living breathing thing.
The other image though, hard to get close to, always seeming like the bad guy,
is an image used for the sake of releasing sexual fantasies and nothing more.
These two images are one and the same,
so how is it that one can be treated so differently?
The chicken or the egg.
The chicken or the egg.
Treated like nothing but a sexual object, so a close off from the world results?
Or just so closed off from the world that no one can view this "thing"
as more than just an image?
Which came first. Which came first. Which came first.
Just an image.
Just an image.
Just an image.
Or is that just me?
Probably just me.
Is it their worth, or is it your own worth that you are measuring in order to shut people out?
(have you ever noticed that when a situation becomes uncomfortable for any person, you stop using "I" and start using "you", as if it were a hypothetical situation? Human instinct I guess)
Anyways.
The general respect I have been getting from people as of late is lacking.
Do you really think that just because you don't say it in my presence, means that I don't hear it?
Unfortunately, I hear everything.
Lexie, Lexie, Lexie.
She acted just like that.
Held no moral weight for her words, her actions, and how they affected other people.
All that really mattered was her enjoyment in the moment,
and never how that enjoyment affected her friends, her family, her outward image;
I've never understood how a person could just not care about any of that.
Trust, trust, trust.
How are you supposed to trust anyone, when everyone is genuinely interested in their own well being and nothing else?
You can't blame them,
but you don't like it either.
So what is one supposed to do when there are words both said and unsaid,
that points favoritism in a direction
(that is neither fair, nor unfair)
but still gives off general ideas of whom should be used for what.
Both images of a person, used for sexual purposes
(what else are people for of course?)
But one more than the other.
One image, genuinely used for conversation, for the release of emotions, for feelings and of course the occasional release of invading sexual frustrations,
can arguably become no longer an image, but a tangible, living breathing thing.
The other image though, hard to get close to, always seeming like the bad guy,
is an image used for the sake of releasing sexual fantasies and nothing more.
These two images are one and the same,
so how is it that one can be treated so differently?
The chicken or the egg.
The chicken or the egg.
Treated like nothing but a sexual object, so a close off from the world results?
Or just so closed off from the world that no one can view this "thing"
as more than just an image?
Which came first. Which came first. Which came first.
Just an image.
Just an image.
Just an image.
No comments:
Post a Comment